Consider writing about your experience and musical tastes. Do you like the artist? Is the transcription accurate? Is it a good teaching tool? 
Explain exactly why you liked or disliked the product. These findings demonstrate unique neurocognitive processing whereby memories are updated with information produced during retrieval. Memory updating was reflected in positive potentials after 700 ms that differentially predicted the degree to which recall promoted storage of the session-2-retrieved location. EEG analyses revealed positive potentials (400–700 ms) associated with relatively accurate recall at session 2. Retrieval-induced distortion was revealed in session 3 for those objects tested in session 2, in that those objects were generally placed closer to locations retrieved at session 2 relative to original study locations. Retrieval improved storage, in that recall at session 3 was superior for objects tested in session 2 compared with those not tested. During session 3, cued recall was tested for all associations. During session 2, an electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded during cued recall for a subset of the associations. 
During session 1, people learned object-location associations to criterion and completed a cued-recall test in which locations were recalled upon viewing objects. We tested this prediction using a 3-session protocol. If retrieval modifies memory storage, as hypothesized, neural signals associated with accurate retrieval at that time may be distinct from neural signals associated with the degree of repeated retrieval error evident at some later time.
Alternatively, retrieval may promote storage of retrieved information, and, if retrieval is inaccurate, subsequent recall could be distorted by the retrieved information.
Retrieval (generating information about prior events) may improve memory storage because it entails reactivation. Reactivation of recently acquired information can strengthen memory storage and likely contributes to memory consolidation.
0 kommentar(er)
